- Posted by: abnormalreturns, October 23rd, 2014 at 3:08 pm
Much has been made of the late about the woes facing some of America’s bluest of blue chips. In quick succession IBM ($IBM), McDonald’s ($MCD) and Coca-Cola ($KO) all announced disappointing results. Two of the companies, IBM and Coca-Cola, are large positions at Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway ($BRKB), hence its inclusion in the performance graph below.
The long-term issues facing these companies are not new. What does seem to be new is some greater realization about the secular issues these companies face. Josh Brown at The Reformed Broker writes:
And all three are plagued by the same problem – they’re shrinking. More than this, their shrinkage is finally being recognized on The Street, now that investors are peeling back all of the layers of buyback and dividend subterfuge that’ve kept this fact disguised for so many years.
That fact of the matter is that blue chip companies die all the time. Some times it is due to shifts in technology or simply changing tastes. Shifting how a large multi-national company does business is no easy task. A recent WSJ article looked the problems facing these companies and other brand name American companies. From the article:
“None of these are pathological companies,” says Anil Gupta, a professor of strategy and entrepreneurship at the University of Maryland. Instead, they had adopted what he calls “sticky” resources, not only technological systems, but employees and business processes that are geared to be successful in a particular range of circumstances.
“That’s what makes you successful. That also essentially locks you into the current paradigm,” Prof. Gupta says. “You become big, but you become trapped.”
What is interesting is that these companies are not necessarily losing out to direct competitors. McDonald’s isn’t getting crushed by Burger King ($BKW). Coca-Cola isn’t losing big chunks of market share to Pepsi ($PEP). They are losing out because the market they are targeting are undergoing dramatic shifts. Everyone today knows soda, even diet, isn’t good for you. Coke can buy as many non-soda brands its can but that will not prevent the long term decline in its core sugar water business.
Consumer non-durables are clearly different than technology but the prospect for companies big technological shifts is now a common refrain from history. Ben Thompson in a recent post at stratechery looks at the potential for current darling Google ($GOOG) to get outflanked by competitors. The whole piece is worth a read because the argument about Google is a subtle one. Thompson traces the story of how IBM, first in mainframes, and then Microsoft ($MSFT), in PCs, were eclipsed by waves of new modes of action.
Thompson isn’t calling for a collapse at Google but a more subtle shift where the business they dominate becomes less relevant. He writes:
And so we have our parallel to IBM and Microsoft. IBM didn’t capitalize on PCs because their skills lay on the hardware side, not software. Microsoft didn’t capitalize on mobile because they emphasized compatibility, not the user experience. And now Google is dominant when it comes to the algorithm, but lacks the human touch needed for social or viral content. And so, when all of that brand advertising finally begins to move from TV to the Internet – and that migration is a lot closer than it was even a year ago – I suspect that Google is not going to capture nearly as much of it as many observers might expect.
Google is not only trying to move into different advertising modes but they are also investing in wholly unrelated businesses like self-driving cars. Google recognizes that the cash cow will have to fund the company’s future. As it is for all of the blue chip companies the question is whether that transition can happen fast enough (and successfully) to satisfy investors. And the time to start thinking about these issues is before the market recognizes them, because when that happens it is already too late.
Subscribe to our RSS FeedThe Latest
Thursday links: psychological drivers
abnormalreturns, October 23rd, 2014 at 12:54 pm
Quote of the day Michael Batnick, “Make no mistake that what we’re experiencing now has literally nothing to do with global growth, earnings or valuations. […]
Wednesday links: creative quants
abnormalreturns, October 22nd, 2014 at 12:55 pm
You can keep up with all of our posts by signing up for our daily e-mail. Thousands of other readers already have. Don’t miss out! […]
Tuesday links: gimmicky guidance
abnormalreturns, October 21st, 2014 at 1:20 pm
Quote of the day Herb Greenberg, “I have no idea why companies give short-term guidance, let alone long-term guidance — let alone five-year forward guidance.” […]
Monday links: global market turbulence
abnormalreturns, October 20th, 2014 at 12:46 pm
Markets What is global market turbulence telling us? (Gavyn Davies) Signs of an oversold stock market. (The Short Side of Long) On the high yield-emerging […]
Top clicks this week on Abnormal Returns
abnormalreturns, October 19th, 2014 at 2:13 pm
Thanks for checking in with us this weekend. Here are the most clicked on items on Abnormal Returns for the week ended Saturday, October 18th, […]
Saturday links: the halo effect
abnormalreturns, October 18th, 2014 at 8:00 am
The weekend is a great time to catch up on some posts that were either too long or simply didn’t fit in during the week. […]
Friday links: all the tools you need
abnormalreturns, October 17th, 2014 at 10:53 am
This is an early edition of the linkfest. We will catch back up this weekend. Enjoy. Quote of the day Ben Carlson, “You can’t simply […]
Podcast Friday: personal investment policies
abnormalreturns, October 17th, 2014 at 8:35 am
Every week brings a slew of new podcasts and videos. Meb Faber argues that podcasts are the perfect medium for discussions about finance and investing. […]
Thursday links: spend a little
abnormalreturns, October 16th, 2014 at 12:55 pm
Quote of the day Morgan Housel, “Work a lot, spend a little, save the difference, invest it wisely, leave it alone. It’s not that hard. […]
Abnormal Returns has over its seven-year life become a fixture in the financial blogosphere. Over thousands of posts we have striven to bring the best of the financial blogosphere to readers. In that time the idea of a “forecast-free investment blog” remains as useful as it did six years ago. More »
- Blue chips: big and trapped
- Thursday links: psychological drivers
- Wednesday links: creative quants
- Tuesday links: gimmicky guidance
- Monday links: global market turbulence
- Top clicks this week on Abnormal Returns
- Saturday links: the halo effect
- Friday links: all the tools you need
- Podcast Friday: personal investment policies
- Thursday links: spend a little