Last week we had a post up on the “diversification debate.”  In the meantime we have come across a number of items on the surprisingly controversial topic of diversification.  The discussion ties in nicely with our post yesterday about the question of how many investors really need custom portfoliosJames Picerno at the Capital Spectator takes a look at his Global Market Index under different weighting and rebalancing schemes and comes to this conclusion:

Rather, the point here is simply a reminder that diversifying across asset classes and keeping the mix from going to extremes is competitive and easy to do, and therefore you shouldn’t pay too much for the service. But simple ideas that have a history of working don’t always attract a crowd in finance.

There is no magic in diversification or portfolio rebalancing.  It is cheap and easy to follow.  That being said one could argue that this simple approach is in a certain sense sub-optimal.  However a well-diversified portfolio regularly rebalanced is a strategy that most investors can follow.  The same can not be said for other more active portfolio strategies that investors inevitably abandon at the first sign of trouble.  Better a sub-optimal strategy than no strategy at all.

Other items worth a look:

The power of two simple investing ideas.  (Capital Spectator)

Two persistent myths about international diversification.  (CBS Moneywatch)

Why and how diversification works.  (Bucks Blog)

More on the diversification debate.  (Above the Market)

[repeat] Do you really need a custom portfolio?  (Abnormal Returns)

[repeat] The diversification debate.  (Abnormal Returns)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.