Merger arbitrage fund follow-up
- abnormalreturns
- August 30th, 2010
Late last year we wrote a post on the launch of the IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). At the time we were somewhat skeptical that the fund’s strategy got at the true nature of merger arbitrage. We described it as “arbitrage-free merger arbitrage.” Today the fund gets some (much needed) attention from John Spence at WSJ. Spence writes:
An exchange-traded fund that specializes in merger arbitrage has received a lukewarm reception in the market, but a burst of deal activity may invite some investors to take a closer look.
According to the article the fund has yet to catch on with investors with some $30 million in assets under management. The fund’s open-end competitors, the Arbitrage Fund (ARBFX) and the Merger Fund (MERFX), have over time succeeded in gathering assets from investors (and advisers) interested in merger arb-like strategy returns.
Merger-arb profits play out over a longer time frame and tend to benefit a portfolio through their lower correlations and volatility. To benefit from both of these effects requires a longer time horizon. In addition, both funds are better able to engage in true merger arbitrage by taking short positions in the stock of the acquiring company. Below one can see how the IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF has performed compared to its open-end competitors and the S&P 500.
Source: StockCharts.com
So what do these roughly nine months of performance tell us? Frankly, not a lot. Performance between the three merger-focused funds has been similar. Two things do stand out. First, all of the merger-focused funds are substantially less volatile than the S&P 500. Second, but less so, the merger ETF is more volatile than the open-end mutual funds. This may be due to our earlier point about more precise hedges.
We are not convinced that the ETF structure is best to conduct true merger arbitrage. However if an M&A boom is coming down the road don’t be surprised if investors line up to invest in a fund with “merger” in the title.
Abnormal Returns is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. If you click on my Amazon.com links and buy anything, even something other than the product advertised, I earn a small commission, yet you don't pay any extra. Thank you for your support.
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
blog comments powered by Disqus-
Abnormal Returns has over its six-year life become fixture in the financial blogosphere. Over thousands of posts we have striven to bring the best of the financial blogosphere to readers. In that time the idea of a “forecast-free investment blog” remains as useful as it did six years ago. More » -
Recent Posts
- Wednesday links: Dow divergences
- Controversy is catnip to the financial media
- Wednesday 7atSeven: fighting the market
- Tuesday links: emotional risk of investing
- Tuesday 7atSeven: Greece 2
- Monday links: innovation and humility
- Sunday links: timing matters
- Top clicks this week on Abnormal Returns
- Saturday links: sub-optimal risk taking
- Friday links: out of office reply
-
Archives
-
