Christine Benz at has “seven ways to simplify your investment life.” We believe a vast majority of investors do not do the following:

Jot Down Why You Own Each Investment
Simplification gurus preach that writing down our goals helps us organize our lives to meet those goals. The same can be said for investing: By writing down why you made an investment in the first place, you’re more likely to make sure that the investment meets its original goal. If it isn’t doing what you expected by sticking with a specific investment style and producing competitive long-term returns, you’ll be ready to cut it loose.

Dan Culloton at examines the topic of the relative tax-efficiency of mutual funds and exchange traded funds. The bottom line:

ETFs have been much more tax-efficient, as measured by Morningstar’s tax-cost ratio, than the typical conventional mutual fund. A few exceptions, however, show that ETFs’ tax advantage, while large, is not unassailable.

We are happy that Roger Nusbaum tried to make sense of a pair of dueling columns on the nature of the gold market.

Shawn McCarthy at the Globe and Mail talks with Boone Pickens about the oil market and the role of the Canadian oil sands, in short, “I don’t think you are going to see $50 oil again.”

Keenan Skelly at on the rise of the multi-strategy hedge fund at the expense of hedge fund of funds,

Multi-strategy managers are receiving increasing attention from sophisticated pension funds that want high returns without the extra layer of fees charged by funds of funds. This complex asset class isn’t for everyone, however. Multi-strategy hedge fund managers switch tactically between various strategies to take advantage of opportunities, but this can make their exposures difficult to track and can hinder transparency.

Paul Kedrosky at Infectious Greed notes the escalating war of words between Harvard and Yale on the nature of compensation for endowment managers.

In a follow-up to this BusinessWeek piece, Andrew Lo makes an interesting statement to Chris Farrell,

Economists suffer from physics envy. We would all love to have three laws that explain 99% of economic behavior. But it won’t work…. Neoclassical economics works really well in some areas. But in the financial markets, neoclassical economists have failed miserably. The efficient-market theory has been rejected.

On that note please feel free to add our feed to your favorite feed reader.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.