While not strictly arbitrage the prospects for a cross-Atlantic exchange merger seem bright given the valuation disparity between U.S. exchanges, the NYX Group (NYX) and the Nasdaq Stock Market (NDAQ), and the U.K. exchange, the London Stock Exchange (LSE). According to Aaron Lucchetti and David Reilly in the Wall Street Journal note the potential bidding war that is setting up over the LSE.

But by one measure, at least, LSE’s suddenly lofty shares don’t seem expensive — Nasdaq’s own stock, which trades at a far higher valuation. That raises the question of whether LSE is undervalued, as many of its shareholders and the exchange itself have argued since LSE management has rejected a series of approaches, or if Nasdaq is overvalued.

The answers will have a bearing on how the trans-Atlantic chess game plays out between financial exchanges that have stepped up talks to merge with each other. In a research note published earlier this week, investment-bank boutique Sandler O’Neill found that major U.S. exchanges sported valuations about 75% higher on average than European counterparts.

But many investors say these valuation discrepancies are likely to change, especially with global deals in the works. European exchanges have a lot of advantages that are being overlooked, they say. These include lucrative clearing businesses and growing listings businesses for companies that want to sell their shares outside the U.S., where they aren’t subjected to tough U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley financial-reporting rules.

We previously discussed the logic behind a merger between the NYX Group and the LSE. Our argument was predicated in part on the potential for “regulatory arbitrage” between the two different oversight regimes. As long as the valuation disparity across the Atlantic remains the “urge to merge” will remain difficult to ignore.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.