A comment by a prominent academic has raised the issue of just how much alpha there is out there available to be exploited by the masses of hege funds. This is a crucial question. The main selling point of hedge funds is that they are the vehicle most able to generate alpha. If the amount of alpha is truly limited then it calls into question the fact that hedge funds have become a mainstream asset in institutional portfolios.

Jack Willoughby in Barron's writes that the comments by David A. Hsieh might be making some hedge fund advocates nervous. Unfortunately any discussion of alpha hinges on the exact definition of alpha. Disentangling the returns to certain risk factors from alpha is no easy task.

Alpha has become an overworked mantra in the financial-product sales community. Everyone knows what alpha means, but no one seems sure of how to identify it.

"We respect David's comments and we, like him, believe that alpha is finite, but so much depends upon how one defines alpha," says David Kabiller, founding principal at AQR Capital Management, a Greenwich, Conn., hedge fund that oversees $21 billion. "Definitions can be so ambiguous. For example, did he include merger/arb spreads as a potential source of alpha, or is it a risk premium? What about futures trading strategies? Or even convertible arbitrage?"

No one doubts the rush of capital into hedge funds is going to make generating alpha more difficult. The question for investors is, how much is too much? If hedge fund fees were truly based on the generation of well-defined alpha then there would be no problems. The problem arises when investors might end up paying for returns that do not truly represent skill.

Paul Kedrosky weighs in on this article (and topic) with a certain wit. Noting the comment by one hedge fund industry professional who makes a virtue out of the rush of capital into the industry.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.