We are not sure how to take this, but Jim Cramer has joined us in our criticism of the flood of ETFs coming to market. While we are not big fans of this latest incarnation of Cramer we are always glad to have some one, any one, agree with us.

In a piece at TheStreet.com Cramer laments the rush of ill-conceived funds to the marketplace and the seemingly extreme some fund sponsors are going.

The proliferation of ETFs has gotten so out of control that I would not be surprised to see an ETF of all ETFs. Or a best-of-ETFs ETF. Or a worst-of-ETFs ETF for those who want to bet that the ugly ducklings are going to become swans. How about an ETF that buys high-performing ETFs and shorts poor-performing ETFs?

Not surprisingly Cramer puts the blame on Wall Street for the proliferation in funds because of the potential feeds. We disagree with Cramer that the only ETF we need are based on big, diverse indices, but we think he correct in decrying the changes in the ETF marketplace.

Tom Lydon at ETFtrends highlights a piece by John Authers in the Financial Times on the high turnover at one newly launched ETF. The First Trust DB Strategic Value (FDV) is expected to have turnover in the range of 100-120% on an annual basis. Some interpret this as a step that brings closer the long-awaited “active ETF.” The range of new ETFs is already blurring the line between passive and active portfolios.

The bottom line is that the original arguments for ETFs (indexed, low cost, low turnover, tax efficiency) have been brushed aside in this rush for shelf space in the ETF marketplace. In all likelihood the marketplace will sort out the winners from the losers in this space, but the risk is that investors get hurt in the interim.

To read more of our ETF posts: Orphan ETFs, ETF Hurdles, and Currency cornucopia.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.