In an earlier post we discussed the unique implications of the News Corp. (NWS) – Google (GOOG) search/advertising deal. Subsequently we have come across a slew of interesting posts on the topic that are by and large positively inclined towards the deal.

David Vise at breakingviews (via DealBook) thinks the deal is further evidence of Google’s ability to “convert traffic into ad revenue” better than its competitors. Rather than being indicative of Internet-era hype the deal is more an endorsement of both firm’s place in the firmament of the Internet.

Chad Brand at the Peridot Capitalist thinks the deal is a “win-win” proposition.

Google needs growth. MySpace needs to make some money. As a result, this deal seems like a perfect match to me.

Abbi Adest at Seeking Alpha highlights some comments made by Rupert Murdoch on the News Corp. earnings conference call. Murdoch is excited by the prospects of Fox Interactive Media.

Clearly, I’m excited about our prospects in interactive media. Previously I’d say that FOX Interactive could expect to generate at least $500 million in revenue this fiscal year. In light of our Google deal and other momentum, that should be pretty easy to reach. Other News Corp sites are generating a further 30 million unique visitors with about $100 million in revenue.

However what is good for Google is by definition bad for its competitors, like Yahoo! (YHOO). Rob Black also at Seeking Alpha sees this as an endorsement of Google’s dominance in this space, which comes at the expense of the also-rans.

The news of the deal did prompt one portfolio manager to take action. Andrew Feinberg at Kiplinger.com used the occasion of the deal to initiate a position in News Corp. stock.

The MySpace.com advertising deal is interesting on any number of levels. What we find interesting is that it puts a tangible value on intangible assets. Despite its success in attracting users, MySpace to-date has not been a substantial revenue generator. With this combination we will now see just how much those eyeballs really are worth.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.