One topic on which we have been focusing on recently is the rise of quantitative investing. Due in part to their recent success and the halo-effect of many new strategy-driven ETFs, quants have acquired a new-found respect on Wall Street. In the Financial Times there are a trio of items on the this trend.

Deborah Brewster reports on the rapid growth occurring at Barclays Global Investors who manage money exclusively via quantitative methods. The rise in quant funds, including hedge funds, is in direct contrast to the 1990s where discretionary methods prevailed.

Three of the 10 biggest hedge funds in the world are purely quantitative.

The trend, which has given rise to nervous jokes about computers taking over, contrasts with the investing style prevalent in the 1990s, which was based on individuals making decisions.

According to the quantitative investing is growing twice as fast as traditional methods. Advocates for quantitative investing will point to the methods used allow these programs to sift through data in an unbiased manner, thereby avoiding common “behavioral” pitfalls of human managers.

With the rise in popularity of quantitative methods it should be all that surprising that one of the biggest quant hedge funds is looking to expand. Deborah Brewster in the* reports on a marketing push into traditional asset management by DE Shaw. One of the twists is that these accounts will be allowed to short up to a certain extent.

We would be remiss if we did not point to an amusing piece by Jay Walker over at the Confused Capitalist on the related topic of so-called “enhanced” ETFs. In it he takes to task worrywarts who are fearful of these new strategy-driven ETFs. Walker notes these funds are simply another form of semi-active management that we have seen previously. In other words, “there is nothing to fear here, folks.”

We will reiterate our caveat that quantitative investing is no panacea. In one of the FT articles a critic complained that recent quant fund outperformance, has of late, simply been a function of the return on “value” factors. That could very well be the case. That said, there are decided advantages to quantitative methods. We will keep our eyes open for additional items on the topic of quantitative investing.

*Hat tip to DealBook.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.