Despite it being a holiday-shortened week we are happy to see it come to a close with another jam-packed linkfest.

DealBook points to a report that shows the hedge fund industry is becoming increasingly top heavy.

Speaking of hedge funds, Roger Ehrenberg at Information Arbitrage thinks Moody’s new hedge fund risk ratings will have little impact in a hedge fund industry that is shaped like a “barbell.”

On the hedge fund front, Ticker Sense has some idea of what stocks the largest hedge funds are currently selling.

Chet Currier at wonders whether investors shouldn’t just get comfortable with the question of market volatility instead of trying to seek our a placid equilibrium.

The month of September is one known for volatility. Michael Kahn at wonders whether September will be all that cruel this year.

Lisa Scherzer at interviews Ned Davis on the importance of the four-year election cycle noting the fact that this month represents a turn in the normal cycle.

Eddy Elfeinbein at Crossing Wall Street points to research showing consensus forecasts of GDP to be “…all but worthless.”

As requested Adam Warner at the Daily Options Report comments on the addition of a new competitor to the (already) crowded options marketplace.

On the subject of options exchanges, the CBOE is on track to be a for-profit exchange in the next year.

Random Roger does not find much of interest in the NYSE document on ETFs.

Ever wonder what one of the largest pension fund’s asset allocation looks like?

Going Private has been reading the Economist, or is it the other way around?

Andrew Pollack in the New York Times reports on how the ethanol boom is affecting the way seed companies are optimizing their breeds for distillation.

To hop on board the growing Abnormal Returns bandwagon simply add our feed to your favorite feed reader.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.