If it is not clear by now we are big fans of the work over at CXO Advisory Group. They do an admirable job of highlighting new and interesting academic research with an emphasis on actionable insights. The value of academic research comes not only from the results found, but in the questions asked.

In a recent post CXOAG reviews a paper that surveys recent research into the equity risk premium, or ERP. It is important to note that there are indeed a number of different flavors of ERP and the paper discusses the relevant differences between them. We suggest interested readers check out both the paper and the summary.

In a sense, there is nothing more fundamental to the practice of finance than the equity risk premium. An estimate of the ERP is required for all manner of investment analysis and corporate finance. Without some idea of our required return for the market as a whole we cannot derive reasonable assumptions for the valuation of companies, nor can we conduct an asset allocation exercise.

The funny thing is that academic finance has had a difficult time coming up with a consistent definition of the historical equity risk premium and a more difficult time deriving a forward-looking estimate. We will leave the discussion of this to the paper itself, but this situation does merit a comment.

In short, the output from academic finance, while valuable, should be viewed with a measure of skepticism. If academics cannot agree on something so fundamental, then what should we believe? However, just because some professors disagree on a topic does not mean we should throw out their work without due consideration. The only way we can advance our understanding of the world around us is through rigorous research, based in the scientific method.

Not surprisingly there are disputes in academic finance over theory, data and methodology. That only magnifies the importance of understanding the underlying assumptions and processes used in any particular piece of research. While headlines may attract the most attention, it is often the guts of a paper that truly tell the tale.

The fact is that no one said this whole investing thing would be easy. The point is that it is hard. If it was easy then everyone and their brother would already have a hedge fund.  Oh wait, they already do

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.