Last week we discussed the potential for credit market stress to spill over into a broader rise in risk aversion. As losses pile-up in the subprime sector there seems to be a reluctance to take risk in other, seemingly unrelated, sectors like buyout-related securities.

These knock-on effects continue to work themselves through the system. While it is unclear what the eventual outcome will be, it is clear that stresses are popping up all across the board. We don’t have any greater insight than that previously mentioned, but here are some additional posts on the topic that help put into some perspective what it happening in the capital markets.

Dennis K. Berman at on the growing tensions between investment banks and private equity funds as the i-banks pull back on their willingness to provide credit for additional deals.

Calculated Risk notes the difficulty investment banks are having in putting together syndicates for already announced buyout deals and the bond ‘inventory overhang’ from already completed deals.

What is going on with ACA Capital Holdings (ACA) stock? Floyd Norris and Vikas Bajaj at note a sizable drop in the stock as the fears that their subprime-related businesses will take a hit.

Roddy Boyd at the New York Post reports on calls from prime brokers for greater collateral for hedge funds who invest in all manner of mortgage-related securities.

Felix Salmon at Market Movers wonders if fund managers are factoring in ‘illiquidity risk’ into their derivative security pricing models.

Alea highlights a research paper that notes investor preferences for securities with “negatively skewed payoff distributions” like CDOs.

Doug Kass at on the role leverage has played in previous bubbles and how “…leverage is always the monster that kills, and it will likely have a primary role in upsetting this cycle as it has had historically.

Gwen Robinson at FT Alphaville highlights some contrarian thoughts on the subprime crisis. Could it be that the subprime crisis is good for plain-vanilla Treasury bonds? Both a flight-to-safety and the increased chance of Fed rate cut could lead to lower Treasury yields.

We hope these helped provide some perspective.  However, it should be clear that the subprime mortgage mess story is not over, not even by a longshot.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.