Please note that Abnormal Returns will be on hiatus the rest of the week. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Neuroeconomics hits Wall Street and finds that “the riskier the trades get, the more the brain craves them.” (

Is the Justice Department going to put the hurt on a CME-NYMEX merger? (Deal Journal, NakedShorts)

The challenge for hedge funds to attract talent and to develop novel investment strategies. (

Sector correlations have ticked up in this more volatile (and nervous) environment. (Bespoke Investment Group)

Backing into a blogger’s asset allocation. (

Timely insider selling (and buying) in the homebuilder stocks. (Bespoke Investment Group)

Higher costs and lower tax efficiency make the case for actively managed ETFs more difficult. (

One public hedge fund is reporting good news. (DealBook,

Ample liquidity, but little interest in putting it to work. (MarketBeat)

“The credit rating agencies have no business rating structured finance, new scale or not.” (Alea)

The monoline bond insurers may have to go into “runoff mode.” (naked capitalism, FT Alphaville)

Structural issues remain in the development of the Asian bond markets. (FT Alphaville)

The Black Swan is a “fascinating, albeit infuriating book.” (Crossing Wall Street)

“Remain independent. It’s your money, not theirs.” (

“We normally think of success as bringing happiness, but the research concludes that the line of causation goes the other way as well: happiness brings success.” (TraderFeed)

Managerial overconfidence in the C-suite. (

U.S. wireless operators are emphasizing data over voice. (GigaOm)

Economists hadn’t paid too much attention to the ISM non-manufacturing survey…until this week. (Econbrowser)

Two proposals for the finance blogosphere. (Market Movers, Crossing Wall Street)

Thanks for checking in with Abnormal Returns. You can always reach us with questions and/or feedback.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.