Late last year we wrote a post on the launch of the IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA).  At the time we were somewhat skeptical that the fund’s strategy got at the true nature of merger arbitrage.  We described it as “arbitrage-free merger arbitrage.”  Today the fund gets some (much needed) attention from John Spence at WSJ.  Spence writes:

An exchange-traded fund that specializes in merger arbitrage has received a lukewarm reception in the market, but a burst of deal activity may invite some investors to take a closer look.

According to the article the fund has yet to catch on with investors with some $30 million in assets under management.  The fund’s open-end competitors, the Arbitrage Fund (ARBFX) and the Merger Fund (MERFX), have over time succeeded in gathering assets from investors (and advisers) interested in merger arb-like strategy returns.

Merger-arb profits play out over a longer time frame and tend to benefit a portfolio through their lower correlations and volatility.  To benefit from both of these effects requires a longer time horizon.  In addition, both funds are better able to engage in true merger arbitrage by taking short positions in the stock of the acquiring company.  Below one can see how the IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF has performed compared to its open-end competitors and the S&P 500.


So what do these roughly nine months of performance tell us?  Frankly, not a lot.  Performance between the three merger-focused funds has been similar.  Two things do stand out.  First, all of the merger-focused funds are substantially less volatile than the S&P 500.  Second, but less so, the merger ETF is more volatile than the open-end mutual funds.  This may be due to our earlier point about more precise hedges.

We are not convinced that the ETF structure is best to conduct true merger arbitrage.  However if an M&A boom is coming down the road don’t be surprised if investors line up to invest in a fund with “merger” in the title.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.