A quick post on the topic of politics and investing.  Jeff Miller at A Dash of Insight has noted many times that investors should be “politically agnostic” when it comes to their investing.  In short, don’t let your political views affect your investing.  Like all rules there are some exceptions.

However a recent post at Global Macro Monitor got us thinking.  In the post the author talks about the failure of the Obama administration to unleash the “green economy.”  That being said the prospects of the administration and the solar stocks seem to be picking up along with the economy.

We decided to to chart the Intrade probability of an Obama re-election (blue-right hand axis) against the performance of the Guggenheim Solar ETF ($TAN) relative to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF ($SPY) (red-left hand axis).  As you can seen since the beginning of the data set solar stocks have been performing poorly relative to the overall market.  Only recently have the stocks begin to perk up.  That bounce has corresponded with a firming in Obama’s prospects for re-election.  Admittedly solar panel pricing is in part affected by the global economy and other countries’ policies so US politics is only part of the equation.

So what does it all add up to?  Who knows.  The bounce in the solar stocks may simply be a reflection of the “dash to trash” by managers playing catch up in 2012.  Then again a smart guy like David Einhorn has covered his short position in First Solar ($FSLR).  The challenge this highlights is investing in sectors and/or companies that are highly dependent on government (subsidies) for their underlying businesses.  In most cases we should ignore politics when investing, but in certain cases you really do have to pay attention.*

Items mentioned:

Politically agnostic. (A Dash of Insight)

Does the solar ETF reflect chances of Obama 2.0?  (Global Macro Monitor)

Barack Obama to be re-elected in 2012.  (Intrade)

Einhorn covered First Solar short.  (Reuters)

The ongoing “dash to trash.”  (Money Game)

*We are ignoring the entire Solyndra issue for the sake of brevity.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.