The intersection of public and private markets is an increasingly interesting topic. In an earlier post I looked at why private companies are reluctant to go public. This is in part due to the poor reception many recent tech IPOs have received in the marketplace.

The disconnect between public and private technology companies is nothing new. In an excellent post @modestproposal notes how the technology life cycle helps explain the current friction. At present the public markets are weighted toward big, mature cash-rich technology companies. The public markets are demanding these companies return more of their cash to shareholders.

Whereas in the private markets all investors at the moment are interested in is growth. The degree to which public companies are investing they are often doing so by investing in private, startups. Here is where venture capitalists are stepping into the breach.

The bottom line from @modestproposal is this:

I see very little reason to believe that tech and public equity investors will get over their differences and start seeing eye to eye. As a result, expect more activists, more proxy fights and more tech companies looking to have dual class share structures.

Conor Sen is has also touched on this issue in a couple of recent posts. In one post he talks about how in Silicon Valley “there’s just not enough “stuff” to go around.” Talent wars, spiraling rents etc. are all signs of a overheated market that can’t put to work, efficiently, all the capital being put to work.

For Sen the question is whether the so-called unicorns will be able to squeeze through the IPO window in a way that allows for a happy ending to this story. Private capital can for only so long fund the technology boom. At some point these companies will have to go public to provide liquidity through the system. Sen notes that might be tough:

Most of the tech IPO’s of this cycle have ranged between disasters and underwhelming. And yet there are 80+ unicorns in the pipeline, all of whom are dreaming of IPO riches to afford a middle class life in the Bay Area. Companies that…are trying to avoid going public as long as possible. While I’m always impressed by the talents of my friends in I-banking, it strains credulity to think that public investors will continue to line up at the trough for IPO’s when so few of them are winners.

So Silicon Valley is in a very real way at a crossroads. Companies are reluctant to come public because they see the rigors of the public markets as a challenge. In the most recent wave of IPOs many companies have “broken.” However at some point the system needs to refresh itself with public capital. Therein lies the conundrum.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.