Sometimes in the course of putting together the daily linkfests and standalone posts I end up with some items that I don’t know where to put. I have already written a couple of posts on the coronavirus and what experts are saying about the best ways to stay safe. In that same vein here are some items from the past week that are are worth a look. I would typically say ‘Enjoy’ here but there is nothing enjoyable about any of this. Instead I will say: be safe.


Russ Roberts spoke with Paul Romer about the importance of testing to re-open the US economy.  (EconTalk)

A lack of testing and effective tracing is an ‘information failure’ that will likely only be overcome by an effective vaccine. (Bloomberg)

We need to emulate what other countries that have been successful have done in taming the coronavirus. (Time)

When you undercut the science, you leave the field wild open to cranks and conspirators.  (STAT)


Why public officials should look to phase in activity based on various factors.  (Harvard Business Review)

Stacking various safety measures, including masking wearing, enhanced hygiene etc., is effective but harder than staying in lockdown.  (New Yorker)

Why any re-opening plans need to be responsive to what is happening on the ground with the virus. (The Walrus)

Complexity and confusion are mortal enemies of public health.  (Bloomberg)

We need to do more to protect the most vulnerable in the population.  (NYTimes)


What some public health officials will (and won’t) do when economies re-open.  (Washington Post)

What we know about the risks of catching the coronavirus outdoors.  (NYTimes)

Some generally common sense guidelines for anyone.  (The Conversation)

A continuum of risks from high (bars) to low (outdoor activities).  (Business Insider)

Messaging is important. The public needs to better understand the virus.  (The Atlantic)

Quarantine fatigue is real. We need to give people the tools to make better, safer decisions.  (The Atlantic)

Assessing the relative risks of exposure.  (Bloomberg)

A great graphic that shows the relative risk of various activities. (@julialmarcus)

Earlier on Abnormal Returns

Acceptable risks in a world full of uncertainty (Abnormal Returns)

Having no plan is just as bad as not following the plan you have (Abnormal Returns)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.