Matthew Goldstein in writes that Refco may claim another victim. Apparently there are questions as to the relationship between a PlusFunds principal and the now defunct broker, Refco. The story is interesting in part because of the numerous ties between a number of Wall Street firms.

Michael Kahn at Barron’s is skeptical, but “..cannot write off the bull market just yet.”

Chart of the Day graphs how the first five days of January affects future returns.

Mark Hulbert at notes the relative calm in the market in 2005 presages “…another year of relatively listless market action.”

Mark Gongloff, Scott Patterson, and David A. Gaffen in a “Trading Shots” piece at the comment on the prospects for three favored asset classes.

Ian McDonald in the Wall Street Journal notes that an increasing number of stocks have higher after-tax yields compared to treasury bonds.

Tom Lauricella and Diya Gullapalli in the Wall Street Journal rehash the actively managed vs. index fund debate. In short, don’t let short-term trends in performance sway your belief one way or another.

Daniel Drezner notes that two Pacific Rim countries are taking different approaches towards the U.S. dollar.

James Hamilton at Econbrowser wonders why the oil shock of 2005 did not seem to have much bite?

Not that they needed it, but Emma Trincal at highlights a little noticed piece of legislation that makes it easier for hedge funds to attract pension fund assets.

If you enjoyed this post, then consider adding our feed to your favorite feed reader. Have a nice weekend.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.