We have previously noted the wretched state of executive compensation in corporate America. Now a modest attempt to shine some light on the varied ways executives are compensated is coming under attack.

James Surowiecki in the New Yorker weighs in the topic. Apparently large institutional shareholders interested in obtaining better information on the state of executive compensation prompted the SEC to act.

Surowiecki makes two important points. The first is that executive compensation is important because of the sheer scale of the dollars going out the corporation’s coffers lining executives pockets. The second is that academic finance has found that overpaid executives engage in all sorts of activities detrimental activities. Surowiecki concludes:

This doesn’t mean that all lucrative pay packages are a waste of money. But, more and more, big investors are treating excess compensation as a reliable index that something serious may be wrong. In particular, it’s often a sign that a company’s board of directors is catering to the C.E.O.’s whims rather than supervising him. While the S.E.C.’s new rules won’t solve the problem of weak boards or overweening C.E.O.s, they will make it easier for investors to figure out exactly who is being paid what, and to make an informed decision about whether to buy or sell a stock. We shouldn’t expect to see a dent in executive compensation anytime soon. But in the long run companies that don’t balance pay with performance tend to suffer where it matters most—in the stock market.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.