Aren’t the best solutions usually the simplest solutions? It certainly is the case when it comes to gas prices and consumption.

Instead of the interminable debates about CAFE standards, hybrid engines, and ethanol, doesn’t it make more sense to simply raise taxes on gasoline? We understand there are political issues with this policy, but there are ways to make it palatable to the vast majority of Americans.

That is the argument of Robert H. Frank in the New York Times. The proposed plan is not a simple $2 a gallon gas tax. It includes a mechanism whereby taxpayers would receive a rebate via the payroll tax, making them, on average, breakeven.

Frank acknowledges there are political roadblocks to any sort of gas tax plan. The fact of the matter is that a wide swath of constituencies support just such a plan.

The gasoline tax-cum-rebate proposal enjoys extremely broad support. Liberals favor it. Environmentalists favor it. The conservative Nobel laureate Gary S. Becker has endorsed it, as has the antitax crusader Grover Norquist. President Bush’s former chief economist, N. Gregory Mankiw, has advanced it repeatedly.

By all accounts this sort of rise in gasoline prices would reduce demand for the product in the long and short runs. This would also provide an impetus for the development of other technologies, while making current supplies of petroleum last longer.

The big question is why isn’t this policy at least discussed?

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.