In our continuing attempt to highlight investment topics with non-financial analogies we bring you the issue of menu length. The fine folks at web application developer 37signals examine the topic of “excess choice” in the context of restaurant menus. (The point was driven home to use because we have actually dined in one of the establishments mentioned!) Although the lesson they draw is in the context of application development it is just as useful for traders as well.

The problem with the Leona’s approach is choice has a cost. It’s one of the reasons why we always talk about less here: Endless options can actually produce genuine suffering. “The Paradox of Choice” (good summary at the New Yorker) talks about how options can actually be “de-motivating.” Offering shoppers samples of six items yields more sales than offering samples of 24, students who are offered six extra credit topics are more likely to write a paper than students who are offered 30, etc. In some cases, just one additional choice can produce outright analysis paralysis. People wind up frozen by indecision.

In a world where technical analysis applications have dozens (if not hundreds) of indicators, and a nearly infinite combination of parameters, this lesson should ring true. It should not be surprising that traders can become indecisive in the face of this information overload. This “analysis paralysis” is most likely to strike at times of high market stress. Traders need to remember that models are there to serve your trading, not the other way around.

Model building, which can take many forms, should only be as complicated as it needs to be – no more, no less. While additional indicators or variables may make a back-test look better in theory, in practice this additional complexity will only make the actual application of the model more problematic. Trading is never easy, but it can be a bit more manageable with well-designed, streamlined models.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.