Part of what we do here at Abnormal Returns is to look for items outside the realm of finance and investing to help illustrate important concepts. For instance, we discussed how recent research into “rogue waves” can help us to understand the idea of stock market crashes.

That is not to say that there is not much to learn from the world of academic finance. While much of academic finance has little to say to the individual investor, the theoretical and empirical work from this realm has much to say to how we as investors go about building portfolios.

We were reminded about the importance of empirical testing in reading an article by Michael D. Lemonick at on the “unraveling of string theory.” Lemonick does a nice job of both describing string theory and why opinion is turning against the theory.

String theory is an extraordinary complex topic in theoretical physics that is seeks to (in short) be “the theory of everything.” The problem is that the theory is largely untestable. The basis of science is hypothesis testing. Without a way to test string theory it is impossible to say it is true or false.

It was bad enough, they say, when string theorists treated nonbelievers as though they were a little slow-witted. Now, it seems, at least some superstring advocates are ready to abandon the essential definition of science itself on the basis that string theory is too important to be hampered by old-fashioned notions of experimental proof.

We recommend the piece as a whole. As Lemonick notes it could very well be the case that string theory eventually proves itself to be the answer to the most important questions in theoretical physics. That however will not occur until some physicist can come up with a way to test it.

Every one involved in the markets can remember being presented with some “grand theory of the markets” that on the face of it seemed to make sense. However after a modicum of probing it was clear that this so-called theory was little more than the figment of an overactive imagination. Finance, while not a science, does have the benefit of empirical testing.

So the next time you hear about some really novel investing concept, step back and ask yourself a couple of questions. 1. Is this concept supported in whole (or in part) by established financial theory? 2. Is there any empiricial evidence to support said theory? If not, run, don’t walk away.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.