Although our coverage of the options backdating scandal has waned as the story transitions from the discovery phase to the investigation and prosecution stages we are still keeping an eye out for new angles on the story. We are usually less interested in the the specifics on a specific company than in the larger story of privilege and executive (over)compensation.

In a prior post we discussed our hunch that given the seemingly widespread nature of options backdating that there had to be a source to all these option plans. We suspected that so-called executive compensation consultants were likely suspects. In at least one instance we were wrong.

In the Wall Street Journal, Mark Maremont reports on options backdating at Tyco International (TYC). Given the significant number of court filings there is some additional insight into this company’s attempt to compensate management via backdated options.  In this case, the compensation consultants called management to to task.  From the article:

Tyco International Ltd. backed off a 1999 plan to grant a type of backdated stock-option award after being warned against the practice by an outside compensation consultant, according to court records.

The admonition by the consultant, Towers Perrin, was included in hundreds of documents entered into evidence in last year’s criminal trial of two former Tyco executives, but hasn’t previously been connected to the current options-manipulation scandal.

With scores of companies under federal investigation for backdating, some executives and defense lawyers have tried to defuse the situation by asserting that the practice was so common that many people must have believed backdating was proper. But the clear warning in the Tyco case shows that at least some outside advisers were aware that backdated stock options were problematic.

This is of course only one case. But it is heartening to read that at least one player in this saga was aware at the time that management’s goal in options backdating was wrong, if not illegal. Unfortunately this is not going to be the last case in this ongoing options backdating scandal.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.