There are a number of reasons why investment managers choose to start a hedge fund. Refugees from larger, mainstream investment organizations often look to hedge funds as a means of practicing their investment craft in a “pure” setting. Leaving behind the bureaucracy of a larger organization can be liberating in both a professional (and personal) sense.

Given the flood of stories recently on hedge funds one has to wonder whether the allure of running a hedge fund has dimmed at all? As the minimum size of hedge fund start-ups has grown over time the marketing requirements have increased as well. With this publicity and higher profile comes the potential for negative press.

Not only is the press more interested now than ever in the inner workings of hedge fund operations, but so is the government. DealBook reports on the growing unease in Washington with the “unregulated” nature of hedge funds. Whether this interest is genuine or simply for the benefits of the cameras is unknown, but Congress remains interested in further hedge fund disclosure.

The chairman of the Senate Finance Commitee, Charles Grassley, believes that hedge funds pose too much risk to the nation’s pension system and on Monday asked the Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., to find a way to make their operations more transparent.

Not only is the government breathing down the collective neck of hedge funds, but the Wall Street Journal today has (at least) three stories on the goings on in hedge fund land. Given the increased size and stature of the industry this is understandable, but we doubt that the given managers mentioned in this articles have much desire to be fodder in the country’s top business newspaper. For example:

Henny Sender discusses the uneasy working alliance between debt-focused hedge funds and the private equity firms who issue ample amounts of debt. While the relationship remains a useful one for both at the moment, the risk that an economic slowdown and rise in defaults could derail this mutually beneficial relationship.

Gregory Zuckerman and Alistair MacDonald discuss the rapid assent and (equally) rapid descent of Vega Asset Management. A particularly poor year in 2006 has set off a wave of redemptions that have shrunk the firm’s asset base. The only question that remains is whether the firm can survive this episode intact.

Scott Patterson reports on how one hedge fund firm, Ritchie Capital Management, that has survived an investor revolt. Ritchie has been able to restructure their hedge fund on the fly in the face of investor opposition to a change in investment strategy. At least not every story has to end badly, we guess.

Before the press was paying attention hedge funds went in and out of business on a regular basis. The difference now is that this news is publicly available and prominently featured. One of the benefits of a hedge fund structure was that it allowed the manager the time and flexibility to best implement his or her given investment strategy. Given the increasing pressure from clients and the press alike it will be interesting to see if hedge funds will continue to be a preferred destination for risk capital.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.