Michael Mauboussin at Legg Mason Capital Management has another research piece up in his semi-regular “Mauboussin on Strategy (.pdf)” series. This time inspired by a new book by Scott Page entitled The Difference, Mauboussin explores how the “wisdom of crowds” works for some specific problems.

The article (and the book) look at the conditions under which crowds may do a better job of prediction than individual experts. Mauboussin writes:

Debate about the wisdom of crowds—the idea a collective can solve problems better than most individuals within the group, including experts—has percolated in recent years. While enthusiasts and detractors have made their case, much of the marshaled evidence is anecdotal. Even when the idea’s supporters specify the necessary conditions for the wisdom of crowds to succeed, there is rarely discussion of how it works.

While the question of collective prediction is important in a wide range of areas, readers of this site are interested in how this may be specifically applied to the stock market. One of Mauboussin’s thoughts on the topic:

Wisdom of crowds and market efficiency. A number of leading finance academics, including William Sharpe, Richard Roll, and Jack Treynor, have pointed to the wisdom of crowds as a plausible explanation for market efficiency. We are enthusiastic advocates for this view as well. The value of this approach is it reveals the conditions under which markets are likely to be efficient or inefficient.

There is obviously a great deal more going on in this piece and the book itself, and hope this whets your appetite for more.  We thought our readers, and especially fans of James Surowiecki’s The Widsom of Crowds would be interested in Mauboussin’s take on the topic.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.