Every once in a while we come across a handful of items that touch on topics we have previously discussed. While worthy of note they (in our opinion) do not individually rise to the level of a full post. So in no particular order:

The always level-headed Jonathan Clements at WSJ.com discusses how investors should approach the new slew of ETFs in light of the possibility that many of them may languish with low asset bases and higher fees. Our post on Orphan ETFs we discussed this very possibility.

Kathyrn Kranhold at WSJ.com notes increasing pressure on General Electric (GE) to look to ways to enhance shareholder value including a break-up of the company. Dana Cimilluca at Deal Journal looks at the debate as well. We had discussed in our post Disaggregation and shareholder value the role private equity firms could play in re-making GE.

Howard Lindzon highlights a recent episode of Wallstrip on the “Sell in May” phenomenon and seasonality in general. Readers of this site know that we have touched on this topic more than once.

Barry Barnitz at Financial page highlights a recent paper that explores the role asset allocation has played in the performance of university endowment funds. In an earlier post, Academic excellence, we noted how the strong performance of this high profile group of investors has changed the way many invest.

Most recently we discussed the question of super-voting shares in light of the News Corp. (NWS) bid for Dow Jones (DJ). DealBook has a post on the use (and abuse) of super-voting shares and posits an interesting proposal for their use.

We hope you found one (or more) of these items of interest. A traditional linkfest to follow.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.