At what point does a diversifier become a hedge?  Asset allocation has been driven of late by the desire to access a wide range of alternative asset classes.  University endowments like Harvard and Yale have become the gold standard in investment management.  (See this post by Mebane Faber at World Beta on the subject.)  The entire drive for broad diversification is an attempt to access a diverse set of risk premia in addition to generating active alpha.

The case for including an asset class in a portfolio is often made on the correlation of that asset with other “core” asset classes.  Emerging markets have been touted for some time as an excellent portfolio diversifier due in large part to their low correlation with developed market equities.  (The folks at Bespoke Investment Group have a cool correlation matrix showing recent changes in asset class correlations.)

This question about diversification came to mind when reading an article by Agnieszka Baczyk and Herbert Mayo at  In it the authors examine the correlation coefficients of a variety of emerging market equity ETFs against the S&P 500 (SPY).  In their research they find that the correlations are higher (and rising) than that previously reported in the literature.  Where they go off track is in their conclusion:

To achieve diversification, the numerical values of the correlation coefficients relating the returns on the alternative investments need to be small or even negative. The correlation coefficients calculated in this study are relatively large and inconsistent with prior research. Based on these results, investing in emerging market ETFs traded on American securities markets no longer offers much potential to diversify a portfolio consisting of American stock.

That is indeed a high standard for a portfolio diversifier.  They seem to be saying that even mild portfolio diversification is not worth the effort.  For instance, most investors include both large and small cap equities in their portfolio despite their very high correlation.  It seems the authors are conflating the issue of diversifiers and hedges.  Hedges are explicitly designed to (or inherently) provide offsetting returns.  Applying that standard to portfolio diversifiers would in fact eliminate many asset classes from consideration.

Another point is that you cannot judge diversifiers simply by the results of a correlation matrix.  Portfolio construction involves assembling assets that generate different risk premia across time and space.  It is pretty clear that emerging markets, especially the frontier markets, are not simply S&P 500 wannabes.  Their returns come from a very different set of real economic factors.

Emerging market equities may (or may not) be the greatest asset class since sliced bread.  After a strong multi-year run, led by the BRICs, they have pulled back substantially this year.  But emerging markets do provide investors the opportunity to access risk premia that are different from typical core assets like the S&P 500.  The decision to include emerging market equities in your portfolio, especially via the raft of ETFs now available, is always your own.  But you should not be scared away from them simply because their correlations are at times closer to 1 than 0.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.