As a little crowdsourcing experiment we are going to try something new.  Below are the top ten posts Abnormal Returns readers clicked on for the week ended on Friday, October 30th.  The description is as it read in that day’s linkfest.

You could use this in a couple of ways.  First it could serve as a quick catch-up on what went on this past week.  In addition it might give you some clue as to what other readers found worthy of a click.

  1. Everyone is reading the newly bearish quarterly missive from Jeremy Grantham.  (Market Beat)
  2. The petrodollar recycling machine is humming again.  (Gregor Macdonald)
  3. Eric Falkenstein, “I would estimate 90% of all alpha is misrepresented.”  (Falkenblog)
  4. Investment books to help you think like an investor.  (Contrarian Edge)
  5. Paul Tudor Jones, gold and the future of hedge funds.  (The Pragmatic Capitalist)
  6. Nassim Taleb can’t understand why everyone misinterprets his writings.  (Falkenblog)
  7. Most investors would have been better off doing nothing the past eighteen months.  (IndexUniverse)
  8. A legal way to profit off insider trading.  (New Rules of Investing)
  9. Five steps to consistent profits.  (Kirk Report)
  10. What is the best way to “buy volatility“?  (Daily Options Report)

This approach is imperfect for any number of reasons including its dependence on the strength of our write-up, where it sits in the linkfest and items which include multiple links.

We also wanted to provide links to the five top Abnormal Returns posts (excluding linkfests).

  1. Why should we assume there is a stable relationship between the price of crude oil and the S&P 500?  We shouldn’t.  (Abnormal Returns)
  2. How is that the bond market is perceived to be “smarter” than the stock market?  (Abnormal Returns)
  3. Is buy-and-hold the best of a bad lot?  (Abnormal Returns)
  4. Pattern seeking run amok.  How we humans (and investors) see patterns were none exist.  (Abnormal Returns)
  5. David St. Hubbins, Bush & Obama, Wal-Mart (WMT) and why context matters when consuming media.  (Abnormal Returns)

We hope you found this little experiment interesting.  Please feel free to drop us a line or leave a comment below with your thoughts.  Thanks for reading this week.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.