In an earlier post we took a critical look at the consequences of Mark Cuban’s advice to individual investors. The upshot was that Cuban was advocating market timing in the guise of “invest in what you know.”

In an op-ed in today’s New York Times the head of the Yale University endowment David Swensen took to task the mutual fund industry for it’s many failures to protect individual investors from their own worst mistakes.  He thinks this is due in part to the conflict of interest between for-profit money management and their duty to investors.  Swensen writes:

The companies that manage for-profit mutual funds face a fundamental conflict between producing profits for their owners and generating superior returns for their investors. In general, these companies spend lavishly on marketing campaigns, gather copious amounts of assets — and invest poorly. For decades, investors suffered below-market returns even as mutual fund management company owners enjoyed market-beating results. Profits trumped the duty to serve investors.

One of the industry’s failures is the marketing the performance of highly volatile funds.  Unfortunately individual investors are notoriously poor market timers who see their rate of return, due to poor timing, fall way behind the headline numbers.  Swensen writes:

Highly volatile technology funds, for example, generated annual returns that were a stunning 13.4 percent below the reported results, as a direct result of monumentally mistimed buying and selling. Holders of less volatile conservative allocation funds suffered only a 0.3 percent annual deficit.

Swensen would like the SEC to take a more activist role in regulating the mutual fund industry and to hold the industry to a higher fiduciary standard.  His advice for individual investors is not altogether new or novel but in light of the ability of most individual investors to effectively manage their portfolios it is likely the best possible solution:

First, individual investors should take control of their financial destinies, educate themselves, avoid sales pitches and invest in a well-diversified portfolio of low-cost index funds, like those offered by Vanguard, which operates on a not-for-profit basis…Such a strategy reduces the fees paid to the parasitic mutual fund industry, leaving more money in the hands of the investing public.

That is ultimately the goal – leaving more money in the hands of the investing public.  Some investors are willing and able to beat the market.  For the broader public a less conflicted mutual fund industry would go some of the way to helping investor keep more of their hard earned money.

UpdateHenry Blodget at Business Insider has weighed in on the topic noting “The fund industry costs investors billions in lost returns every year–while coining money for itself, its employees, and its distributors.”

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.