John Bogle has in the news of late, including here on Abnormal Returns. Many investors believe that the tenets emphasize by Bogle over time including indexing and diversification have gone by the wayside.

Jame Picerno at The Capital Spectator recently wrote up a summary of a speech that Bogle recently gave to NACUBO i.e. The National Association of College and University Business Officers.  In this speech Bogle revisits the performance of a really simple portfolio that includes 50% equities and 50% bonds against the average peformance of college endowments.  The following were the results:


There is no doubt that much time, effort and money was spent trying to generate the returns at the nation’s endowment funds.  In addition there are certainly some funds, like Yale and Harvard, that have handsomely outperformed over this time period.  However a reasonably long time period the most simple portfolio imaginable performed as well or better than most funds.

I have often written that a sub-optimal portfolio strategy is superior to a strategy that cannot be followed.  A 50/50 portfolio, rebalanced quarterly, is about simple as things get.  This yet another example why most investors would be well served by doing very little with their portfolio as opposed to too much.

Items worth reading in their entirety:

A 15-year review.  (Capital Spectator)

The Lessons of History – Endowment and Foundation Investing Today (John C. Bogle)

Is John Bogle a dinosaur?  (Abnormal Returns)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.