Before diving head long into the new year I wanted to point out a a paper that came out last month.  A paper by Paul Woolley and Dimitri Vayanos at the London School of Economics entitled “Taming the finance monster” attracted a fair bit of attention. In it they take to task the owners of capital for essentially putting up with the ongoing shenanigans of fund managers on their behalf. In addition to taking to task efficient markets they try to tackle the principal-agent problem in fund management.

This is surely an overlooked topic in finance. The separation of actual fund management from capital owners presents all sorts of issues. One could argue that market failures, broadly defined, occur because of the mismatch in incentives for the parties. Woolley and Vayanos write:

Agents have learnt that financial markets do not function like goods markets, and that the usual laws of competition do not apply under asymmetric information. Moral hazard, complexity and opacity all help them capture rents. They also benefit from mispricing, volatility and the proliferation of products. The costs and fees of intermediation go hand in hand with pricing inefficiencies in contributing to the erosion of the returns on savings.

As noted earlier the paper attracted a number of pieces in the UK. While their call to a return to long term, fundamental investing sounds good in theory there seems to be a fair amount of skepticism about the likely uptake of the author’s recommendation both for investors and regulators alike. In any event, the principal-agent issue in finance is overlooked one. The paper is worth a look if for no other reason to remind ourselves of it.

Items that mention the Woolley and Vayanos paper:

Market failure.  (Buttonwood’s notebook)

Tackling the two-headed monster of efficient markets theory and the principal-agent problem.  (FT Alphaville)

Time to stop the addiction to momentum trading.  (FT)

Big is not always beautiful.  (Economist)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.