Sometimes you need to take an idea to its illogical end to show you the absurdity of it. For quite some time now I have been writing about the proliferation of ETFs, or the “ETFization of everything.” Which on the whole has been a boon for investors. However the ETF is still happy to create products based on hot trends or a favorable backtest.

Joel Dickson at Vanguard Advisor did a little data exercise creating “AlphaBet portfolios” that in a backtest showed uniform outperformance relative to the S&P 500 over a ten year period. The only hitch is that the strategy being used, an alphabetical one by ticker symbol, should have no bearing on price performance.


Source: Vanguard Advisor

Dickson rightly notes that the outperformance of these portfolios was driven by the inherent small cap bias of this strategy over this time period. He also notes that narrowly constructed indices and favorable historical backtests are designed to “anchor expectations for future performance.” Investors therefore need to look at this kind of marketing data with a jaundiced eye.

John Rekenthaler at Morningstar recently noted that the wave of so-called “smart beta” products is simply driven by weightings toward small caps and value. Neither of which are either new or particularly novel. History has been kind to both of these factors but investors should go into any investment with an understanding of the drivers of future fund performance in mind.

Gimmicky ETFs” are nothing new. The above exercise is a good one because it highlights how even a patently absurd strategy can in a backtest look perfectly profitable. Investors therefore need to arm themselves with the knowledge to understand the construction of new and prospective ETFs. In short, just because some firm can put something into an ETF wrapper does not mean that you shouldn’t take a closer look.

Update: The Attain Capital blog had a good post up last month on the “hard issues” facing anyone dealing with backtested results.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.