Yesterday we reviewed some of the commentary on Calpers decision to opt of hedge funds. The feedback continues to come in so we decided to break out this discussion into a standalone post. The consensus seems to be that picking hedge funds is a difficult task for anyone, including big managers like Calpers, the costs of hedge funds are simply too high and that individual investors are really not missing out on all that much by being locked out of hedge funds. Enjoy.

“Picking the winning hedge fund managers is hard.”  (Alpha Attribution)

The scuttlebutt was that Calpers was bad at picking hedge funds.  (Business Insider)

Why Calpers kicked hedge funds to the curb: negative alpha.  (Alpha Architect also Bloomberg)

Who benefits from the end of hedge funds at Calpers?  (WSJ, MoneyBeat)

Calpers isn’t really going to miss their hedge fund allocation.  (Matt Levine)

Why do institutional investors bother with hedge funds?  (FT, ibid)

Why Harvard should emulate Calpers, not Yale.  (Barry Ritholtz)

Hedge funds never were an “asset class.”  (Brian Portnoy)

Cliff Asness, “We believe there are many strategies pursued by hedge funds and active managers in general that don’t rely on very obscure skills, and therefore that should not earn them two and twenty.”  (AQR)

Breaking down the costs of hedge funds.  (FT Alphaville)

Individual investors should thank their lucky stars they can’t invest in hedge funds.  (Mark Hulbert)

Investors aren’t missing much by avoiding alternatives.  (Aleph Blog)

What lesson should individual investors take from Calpers’ decision?  (Dan Solin)

You can support Abnormal Returns by visiting Amazon or follow us on StockTwits, Yahoo Finance and Twitter.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.