In the conclusion of my book Abnormal Returns: Winning Strategies from the Frontlines of the Investment Blogosphere I noted the unusual fact that the dividend yield on the S&P 500 then exceeded the yield-to-maturity on the ten-year US Treasury note as it does now. This hadn’t happened in earnest since the 1950s. The question is why?

One could argue that it is the result of the financial crisis, and its aftermath, but the trend has been in place for quite some time now. John Authers and Kate Burgess have a big article up at the FT that looks at the end of love affair of investors with equities. They not how the trend towards “de-equitisation” of the markets been going on for quite some time.


There are a number of implications for corporate finance, but the question for investors is whether this dearth of interest in equities represents the new norm or whether it means a new more sustainable equity market environment is at hand? Masa Sedarevic at FT Alphaville asks whether the above article can be likened to the famous ‘Death of Equities’ Businessweek cover that presaged the 1980s bull market in equities.

Mark Cuban writing at blog maverick notes how the bungled Facebook IPO will also kill investor demand for equities, Cuban writes:

1. Say goodbye to the individual investor on Wall Street. Whatever positive impression they had of the IPO market and the stock market in general was just torched to the ground. When everyone you know associated with the stock market is telling you and the media is confirming that this could be a huge IPO that will make money for those lucky enough to get shares and the opposite happens, goodnight. All confidence in the stock is destroyed. Put your money in the bank or if you want to gamble, at least slot machines in Vegas pay out 98pct.

There are plenty of signs that individual investors have to a degree sworn off equities. Sean McLaughlin at The Minimalist Trader thinks the next big market downturn will serve as a catalyst to change the environment on Wall Street from one of people ‘playing the market’ to one of people actually investing in businesses. McLaughlin on what happens first:

Call me crazy, but I’m beginning to like all this negative talk of broken markets, upset IPO investors, crooked CEOs, poor corporate risk management, and retail investor disgust.

The more I hear retail investors complain about “rigged markets” and “the one-percenters” while singing songs about the death of buy-and-hold investing, the more I think the next sizable sell-off is gonna be “The Big One.

But I don’t mean the “Big One” in terms of percentage losses or capital destruction (although likely both could be huge), it’ll be big because the next big sell off could very possibly be the end of the stock market game for millions of investors in America and around the world.

So you can see how the seeds of a generational bottom or a new secular bull market are being sown. Unfortunately with these seeds we do not know how long it will take them to germinate. Valuations now favor equities vs. bonds. Investors (pro and amateur) continue to withdraw funds from the equity markets and anecdotal evidence points to growing dissatisfaction with the current market regime.

If you believe McLaughlin it will take additional pain to get the weak hands to capitulate. That is a scary prospect. One could also argue that (secular) bear markets don’t end in panic, but rather in disgust and there seems to be plenty of disgust in the stock market to go around at the moment. At some point in the future some sort of normalcy will return to the financial markets and the question will be how you will have positioned yourself in the meantime.

Items mentioned:

Markets…out of stock.  (FT)

The death of equities’ …again?  (FT Alphaville)

The Facebook IPO may have killed off the individual investor on Wall Street.  (Blog Maverick)

And who could blame them?  (The Reformed Broker)

Why the next market flush could create a generational bottom.  (Chicago Sean)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here.

Please see the Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.